Direct from the Moon

paixtou Says:

Jan 4, 2009 - why we have to go to the moon? for me is just an image. isn't it great to looking the moon from down here? we destroyed the earth no we have to destroy everything. all the money for this shit is better to give to people that sturv in africa (sorry for my english...)

LaPieinsky Says:

Jan 4, 2009 - I agree,we do have enough equipment to just look,sorry for swearing but I even say it on my profile, enough shit sent into space, look at the Rover on Mars, we don't know what it destroys. OK I appreciate looking at this planet and others but the pics we get are purposedly doctored for most, anyway! All that technology and all we think of is a big fat destructive rrrRover! Same as we do on Earth with cars whereas electric hovercrafts,or style,would be totally feasible.And TRUE, HUNGER on EARTH

Kurt2424 Says:

Jan 4, 2009 - I'll never leave earth... I wish to die here... and besides the moon has no atmospheric 'shield' like our ozone layer, people can't survive being stoned by meteorites...

francobobfred Says:

Jan 5, 2009 - over there ----->

franchyspb Says:

Jan 5, 2009 - I'd risk getting stoned on the moon...

20nineaug94 Says:

Jan 5, 2009 - Lets place colonies on every planet in the universe :D We will meet aliens for sure.

20nineaug94 Says:

Jan 5, 2009 - isn't it strange that we never really seen stars (other than the sun) on pictures taken by NASA??

20nineaug94 Says:

Jan 5, 2009 - It would be incredibly random if they found Osama Bin Ladin hiding on the moon xD

Zurack Says:

Jan 5, 2009 - It's not strange, you need a long exposure to photograph stars, they are quite dim.

gittygittygoo1012 Says:

Jan 5, 2009 - nice well we wont live that long anyway

xXxDerwoodxXx Says:

Jan 5, 2009 - if this really happened how come we dont see any stars or how come the camera doesnt point to the sun at all?

DESIGNERHERO Says:

Jan 6, 2009 - Please subscribe.

Choopmans Says:

Jan 6, 2009 - africa is lost... they need to neuter every single man and woman to stop the starvation, because they just keep making new babies into a shit world. there is NO hope for africa.

CoDF4TH3R Says:

Jan 6, 2009 - it would be more random to post a cooment like that lol

Zurack Says:

Jan 6, 2009 - xXxDerwoodxXx, like I said 2 posts ago, it's not easy to photograph stars, and why would they point at the sun? But I'm sure you can find the sun in some photos in an Apollo images database (Yes, hundreds of images with the exact time they have been taken, that's impossible to fake).

xXxDerwoodxXx Says:

Jan 6, 2009 - ok right but why do we leave earth to get outside of the atmosphere to get better pics of the universe. That is what hubble is doing now

Zurack Says:

Jan 6, 2009 - Inside the atmosphere we need to worry about the weather, day/night cycles, and other problems, but outside, the telescope is always working, you don't need to worry about daylight, clouds, light pollution, and even at night the atmosphere disturbs the telescope images. When it's night, look at the stars, you can see that they flicker, it's because of the atmosphere.

xXxDerwoodxXx Says:

Jan 6, 2009 - at 0:32 seconds in u mean to tell me with all the billions of stars u cant even see 1 little one at all, and i am not saying this never happend either, oh yeah how come today when they leave earth they always bring the worst cameras? not even color? frame rate is horroble.

vflook Says:

Jan 6, 2009 - thats great...I missed the purpose of this. Someone enlighten everyone since no one cares. I just see a tremendous waste if time energy and US tax dollars. Every day I wake up and see how my country is slipping away....are we moving to the moon?

GuerraXV Says:

Jan 7, 2009 - Man on the moon in 1969??? fake sorry!!!

Zurack Says:

Jan 7, 2009 - Get a camera and a shiny astronaut suit, now try to photograph the astronaut AND dim stars at the same time.You need some seconds of exposure to photograph stars, the 0:32 image is just a fraction of a second.Check this image I took of the Moon, Venus and Jupiter:tinyurl (dot) com/9sv6gmIt was taken with an exposure of 1/4 of a second, much longer than the astronaut's photos, and no shiny suits and ground.Sorry, but I know more about astrophotography than you.

Zurack Says:

Jan 7, 2009 - And about the "worst cameras" thing, there is lots of great colored photos in the video that you are watching right now. And even more in other sites and databases. Just the video was not that good, but they have some great videos of Apollo 12 to 17.Oh, and here's a nice video of Apollo 11:tinyurl (dot) com/8s645tThere's like 4 CGI scenes, but they are easy to identify.The video is supposed to be "sentimental", but there is still some great footage of the moon landing.

Zurack Says:

Jan 7, 2009 - Oh, and in the video I linked, they point at the sun!Here is a great site about all this "the moon landing is fake" thing:tinyurl (dot) com/e3gxThe page is quite long and old, but it's very good if you really want to know "the truth".

shadowmanipulator006 Says:

Jan 8, 2009 - hey when neil armstrong first feet touches the ground who was filming with the camera?seriously its gay im sure they put the camera there...erase the footprints and then they climbed back up the ladder and then started filming neils foot touching ground.LOL.

Rigbyband Says:

Jan 8, 2009 - Great Vids!