First Moon Landing 1969

lestershow Says:

Dec 2, 2008 - My uncle worked in the cafeteria at nasa during the apollo project and he can verify its authenticity.

Nanna0708 Says:

Dec 2, 2008 - Why didnt they show the earth with the camera? with that they could shut everyone up. i mean this was a big deal. I personally dont belive it. it just looked to simple for something so extraordinary.

Shanem2012 Says:

Dec 2, 2008 - Look very closely near the end of this video and you will see a glint from the wire that is holding neil armstrong up. There is no dought its a fake. Cover up. Government lies. Why does neil armstrong allways have a look of guilt about him

Ravenflight104 Says:

Dec 2, 2008 - Shanem:Look very closely near the end of this video and you will see a glint from the PLSS backpack communications blade antenna, mounted on top at approx. 10" long.It's funny how people with no knowledge of what they are looking at can so easily pass a sweeping hoax declaration.

Ravenflight104 Says:

Dec 2, 2008 - Nanna:The camera has been pointed at the Earth many times on these missions... they won't shut up anyone who wants a hoax to be true. And please tell me, what should walking on the moon look like ? Have you seen any other videos or photos from the landings?

LunarTuner Says:

Dec 3, 2008 - Shanem2012, do a Google search for: PLSS OPS Antenna and you will discover that you're only seeing the "glint" from an antenna. It's in many videos and on many photos.

socialfarm Says:

Dec 3, 2008 - Nixon President in 1969 when he gave the go ahead to make this poor fake video of the fake moon landing.LBJ had Kennedy killed with the help of his CIA friend George Bush Sr.Very likely.

LunarTuner Says:

Dec 3, 2008 - Bush wasn't director of CIA until 1976! He was running his dad's business when Kennedy was assassinated. But, who cares about facts anyway.

kloratis Says:

Dec 3, 2008 - Now everybody knows this was FAKE

johncopey Says:

Dec 3, 2008 - The internet has become the downfall of the Apollo fraud. You tube has dramatically increased awareness of the fraud, over the last 2 years. NASA are crapping their pants. They even paid mythbusters to try and debunk the evidence!

shanemdonnelly Says:

Dec 3, 2008 - Ravenflight104 it is a fake. They could get a man on the moon in 1969 but they cant do it now in 2008. Technology is much more advanced today and they cant get a man to the moon. Why is there no stars in the video, Not one. Look again near the end of the video were he stumbles and gets slightly pulled off the ground

Charm91 Says:

Dec 3, 2008 - ...and the world hold their breath

LunarTuner Says:

Dec 3, 2008 - shanemdonnelly, can you name specifically what technology you think was missing in 1969?Ask yourself, have you EVER seen a video with things lit as brightly as daytime in the foreground where stars appear in the background? THINK, man!

LunarTuner Says:

Dec 3, 2008 - (ladies and gentlemen, you have just read johncopey's daily rant. Please look back and read the same daily rant over and over on this page. We're not sure if he's a robot or not. Or maybe he's in the bumper sticker business. Please note that he is liable to present statistics and ideas which have no foundation in reality (our reality, that is). Until we understand more clearly what or who we're dealing with, it is advisable to keep your distance. THank you.)

socialfarm Says:

Dec 3, 2008 - You mean Prescott S Bush that died in 1972 who was Connecticut Senator at the time. What do you think helped him to be head of the Mob(CIA) do you not think he was in the CIA doing field work before they made him Godfather? Wow what a simple man you must be. Speaking of 1976 Carter a 1 term Senator(peanut farmer) got to be pres./ sounds like the one we just got served to us(Obama Osama whatever)boy that CFR puts people in high places fast don't they!By the way the CIA answers to nobody.

socialfarm Says:

Dec 3, 2008 - You do know about Prescott and his steel company/weapons contractors Nazi propaganda activities and the weapons provided to both sides durning WWII by that P.O.S.If not maybe you should check out McCormack-Dickstein Committee .But who cares about facts anyway, you smugg ahole.

socialfarm Says:

Dec 3, 2008 - While you are refreshing what you thought you knew you may want to check into Prescott's Dad, Samuel P. Bush who most likely did the same thing in WWI. But you won't be able to prove that one because in those days none of the people had a clue how F'ed up these evil bastards were.That is if you truely care about facts!!!

LunarTuner Says:

Dec 3, 2008 - sf, before your reductionist diatribe on history began, you claimed that George H.W. Bush had his CIA friends assassinate Kennedy. I merely pointed out that he wasn't with the CIA. ...and that's where I will leave it. I have no interest in pursing this. Frankly, your own lecture tells me and everyone here exactly what they need to know about you...and that's where I'll leave it. Now, back to the glorious Apollo 11 moonwalk...

socialfarm Says:

Dec 3, 2008 - And as I said H.W. was with the CIA mob then just not the the boss( Godfather )And I said H.W. was part of the assassination group and LBJ helped to set it up. But I guess you think the Warren report is fact just as you buy the 911 report.And your follow the leader response truely lets everyone here know where you head is, and that's where I'll leave that.Now back to the bogus Apollo EARTHwalk...Facts facts Tuner don't need no stinking facts...

olaffer Says:

Dec 3, 2008 - LT: "Instead, anything that COULD--in some far stretch of the imagination into the deepest corners of probability--have been done another way, that's the direction you go"True! But I don`t see why that is a BAD thing.."These aren't boyscouts.! I wish I could take you to the Kennedy Space Center for a day and walk and chat with the veterans there"I would be pleased! :) Truly! But I don`t see how that would change my veiw of things.A microgravity flight might change my mind... ;)

LunarTuner Says:

Dec 3, 2008 - But reasonable probability is a good thing! Why ignore it? I mean, it's conceivable that the entire thing was filmed by Jerry Lewis under water, behind a McDonalds in Topeka and Mao Tse Tung played the part of Neil Armstrong. That doesn't mean such an idea holds up to the scrutiny of scientific scrutiny or sound reasoning.A microgravity flight would be cool no matter how you look at it.

BritneySpeak Says:

Dec 3, 2008 - reasonable probability isn't a domain you are good at , lunarlamer ! because reasonable probability exclude the manned moon landing to have happened , since it's totally insane (and not reasonable) to have gone outside our protective magnetosphere in solar peak years But beyond that (even if that is already enough as reasonable explanation as to why it's fake) you can't have any reasonable explanation for the spiderman move

BritneySpeak Says:

Dec 3, 2008 - And speaking about the spiderman move , here we go , i give you the link (once again)watch?v=d9kon-URcko : Moon Hoax - Moonset Trickery Revealed-- spiderman at 00:17 (wires) <<-- COOL !!-- wires balance exposed at 00:54 <- COOL !!-- wires pull 'out of synch' exposed at 02:39you can confidently say that it's PERFECTLY reasonable to conclude that they faked it after seeing ONE of these 3 move (and even more of you saw the 3) , but everyone know you aren't reasonable jim.

schmiddyyt Says:

Dec 3, 2008 - OMG LOL You guys seriuos? this is so obveously fake i cant beleave it!!! nasa faked it wit h the help of the cia. wake up peeps. this is all documented if youll just look it up.

olaffer Says:

Dec 3, 2008 - LT: "But reasonable probability is a good thing! Why ignore it? I mean, it's conceivable that the entire thing was filmed by Jerry Lewis under water, behind a McDonalds in Topeka and Mao Tse Tung played the part of Neil Armstrong."Great, LT!I think you just CAPTURED me and my reasoning! You have your own way of understanding us Cognitively Impaired! Great, LT!